Skip to main content

Mercedes hit-and-run: video of accident surfaces

A screen grab of the moment when the Mercedes hit Siddhartha Sharma
New Delhi: A CCTV grab of the Civil Lines hit-and-run incident shows that the 33-year-old victim was flung at least 15 metres into the air after being knocked by a speeding Mercedes allegedly driven by a minor.

The nearly 1 minute 20 seconds-long clip of the Monday's incident, shared with the media by victim Siddhartha Sharma's relatives, shows him trying to cross a clear road near a traffic intersection and later running towards the pavement as he sees the approaching car.

Shortly after that, Sharma can be seen standing still and then taking a step back when he is hit by the car driven at a speed of above 80 Km per hour and flung at least 15 metres into the air, out of the frame of the video.

Passersby later saw a group of youths stepping out of the car and fleeing the scene, leaving the vehicle there.

Police rushed the marketing executive to a hospital, where he succumbed to his injuries. They later found out the car belongs a businessman living in a posh Civil Lines apartment.

Later, the businessman's driver approached police and allegedly claimed that he was driving the car but changed his statement when he got to know that Sharma was dead.

Police recorded eyewitnesses' accounts and scanned dozens of CCTV grabs to ascertain the identity of the errant driver, who turned out to be the businessman's 17-year old son. The boy was apprehended on Tuesday and later released on bail as per legal provisions.

Yesterday, police challaned the businessman under Motor Vehicles Act for handing over the vehicle to his minor son.

Senior officials also said the charge sheet will also include the name of the businessman's driver for allegedly trying to mislead investigators.
PTI

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tum Kitne Afzal Maroge, Ghar Ghar Se Afzal Niklega!

It is hard to trace the origin of sloganeering or probably beyond my capability to do so but if we consider the broad meaning then sloganeering is an act to unite like-minded people, incite them and instill within them a sense of oneness, predominately for some cause. If I am not very wrong, if so I can stand corrected, sloganeering was made famous during the early days of uprising by rebels against the tyrannical rulers. In India, during the struggle for freedom, slogans were made to get people together and rise up against the British Raj. "Inkalaab Zindabaad" was one among many that was probably the most used and by far the most useful slogans used during those days. The two words simply mean "Long live Revolution" but the greater meaning had a great impact in the minds of millions who dreamt of waking up in a free country. Inkalaab Zindabaad was so famous that even in today's generation we use it almost anytime we wish to show our dissent towards s...

IS IT ISLAM THAT KILLS?

Terrorism, in the 21st century, is something that has not only shaken up all parts of the world but also has it brought bad name to the Muslims. People all the world over abuse the religion for giving birth to people who spread terror and kill innocents. And on top of that a new radical Muslim group springs up every now and then. But let us think about it rationally. Does all these incidents actually make the religion or so to say the the Quran a piece of shit? Consider a group of people forming a new radical group going about saying that their religion asks them to kill people, that their religion asks them to fight against the innocent. Does that mean we start believing that there is problem in the religious scripts of that religion? Anybody can claim anything, but we have been gifted with a mind which is supposed to be used rationally and not just follow arbitrary nincompoops. It is also baffling to see that whenever a terrorist attack takes place the media all over uses th...

Sangeet Som’s speech a dangerous premonition?

If there is presence of something today, then there has to be a past and this past is known as HISTORY. For example, if you have a metal idol in your hand, the matter was definitely in the form of an ore in some part of its journey. As for a country, well, knowledge about a State comes after reading about its History and to claim to change the same is dangerous and would ensure a dark future. BJP’s controversial lawmaker, Sangeet Som, who apparently paved way for the Muzaffarnagar riots, is back with yet another bizarre comment that he would change History. You may not like the idea that the Mughals ruled India for a long time but you can’t rub it off from History. After all, if your kid asks you who made the Taj Mahal, would you say that the Bharatiya Janata Party laid its foundation stone? His foolishness was also out in the open when he said that the one who built the Taj Mahal had imprisoned his father. Ehh wait a minute, Shah Jahan imprisoned Jahangir? Really? But t...