Skip to main content

The Abnormality of Normalcy



In today's world we tend to take a lot of things to be normal. While there can be certain conventions, there should be a demarcation.
We tend to overlook or shall I say the society likes to ease matters by looking at them through a forced normal perspective? For instance, some find it very normal to urinate in the public and spit too while in our country there is a system of imposing fine on people who do such. But if we find someone doing so we stop not that person. Good reasons to back the forceful oblivion are; why bother until something is affecting me directly or why at all start a brawl with some person, who like many, thinks urinating in the streets is as normal as saving an injured animal!
Well we might turn a blind eye towards such issues and run a risk of the society turning into a huge public toilet. But certainly we cannot turn blind to the risk of this society turning into a huge hell where women feel not safe.
In India, it has become a cliché to discuss the social issue of women's safety. Let us try to look into the possible reasons which lead to such heinous crimes such as molestations, eve teasing and rapes.
As the title mentions, Abnormality of Normalcy, let me draw your kind attention towards the attitude of the society towards the sensitive issue of women's security. Whenever there is a reported case of a rape or molestation we tend to raise issues like the girl was moving around late in the night or attired she was in a skimpy outfit probably revealing all her assets. But let me ask you all a very simple question. Cannot the men be a little saner to admire the beauty that she is revealing and not take it as a provocation for them to jump on her and tear her apart both physically and mentally?
It is shocking at the same time to learn that a few in our society or rather shall I say sparing a few in our society, the complete society thinks that it is quite normal for a boy to peep into a woman's top in order to get a clear view of her bosom. I say it is as dirty a thing to do as necrophilia. We, by thinking this act to be normal, are provocating our own desires which otherwise should be curbed.
Often I find people saying "Bass dekha hi to, kuch kiya to nahin." Hillarious!
Such a thing is considered to be normal only when it is done towards a girl, who is not immediately attached to us, but I again would like to take the liberty of asking yet another question; what would it be like if a pair of eyes is fixed on the cleavage of your own sister?
And when I am mentioning time and again 'the society' I am consciously pointing my finger at both the genders.
I am sorry to say but a girl's attire does not lead to such crimes lest we wouldn't have heard news of even girls of five or six years being brutally raped. At the same time it is also not correct to put a bar at a woman's staying out post sunset and tagging it a reason for the rise in rapes lest we wouldn't have heard of a case such as the Hetal Parekh rape case.
Why cannot the definition of 'being normal' change? What we have come to accept as normal is what is leading to the rise of such barbaric incidents and not mobile phones as some politicians want us to believe.
Let a few normal matters swap places with their counter abnormality and see whether the scenario changes a bit. I am, yet again not saying that this is an absolute solution to the problem, but definitely it is one of the ways to decrease the current situation.
God has given us all sorts of emotions but at the same time He has given us a rational brain to think and use them rationally and not be a slave to our desires, specially of the bad ones.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

IS IT ISLAM THAT KILLS?

Terrorism, in the 21st century, is something that has not only shaken up all parts of the world but also has it brought bad name to the Muslims. People all the world over abuse the religion for giving birth to people who spread terror and kill innocents. And on top of that a new radical Muslim group springs up every now and then. But let us think about it rationally. Does all these incidents actually make the religion or so to say the the Quran a piece of shit? Consider a group of people forming a new radical group going about saying that their religion asks them to kill people, that their religion asks them to fight against the innocent. Does that mean we start believing that there is problem in the religious scripts of that religion? Anybody can claim anything, but we have been gifted with a mind which is supposed to be used rationally and not just follow arbitrary nincompoops. It is also baffling to see that whenever a terrorist attack takes place the media all over uses th...

Commonly used short forms and their meanings

Ever since the days of our arboreal ancestors, mankind has been trying to reduce effort by innovating new necessities. And the result is in front of our eyes today. We want pizza, it gets delivered to our place. We want grocery, it gets delivered to our place at our convenient time. This urge of humankind to reduce effort has actually helped us in many ways. Like, if our ancestors would not have made use of crude stone tools, we wouldn’t have been able to make the sophisticated equipment we used these days. Thus, everything undergoes change. However, in today’s world, we tend to forget willingly the etymology of the transformed form. Taking the point of reducing effort to another level, let me take you through the commonly-used abbreviations. We all use them, though in our childhood, our teachers used to scold us for using them, nonetheless we used them for our convenience. Using an abbreviation in this fast-paced life is okay but not knowing the origin of the same may pr...

Sangeet Som’s speech a dangerous premonition?

If there is presence of something today, then there has to be a past and this past is known as HISTORY. For example, if you have a metal idol in your hand, the matter was definitely in the form of an ore in some part of its journey. As for a country, well, knowledge about a State comes after reading about its History and to claim to change the same is dangerous and would ensure a dark future. BJP’s controversial lawmaker, Sangeet Som, who apparently paved way for the Muzaffarnagar riots, is back with yet another bizarre comment that he would change History. You may not like the idea that the Mughals ruled India for a long time but you can’t rub it off from History. After all, if your kid asks you who made the Taj Mahal, would you say that the Bharatiya Janata Party laid its foundation stone? His foolishness was also out in the open when he said that the one who built the Taj Mahal had imprisoned his father. Ehh wait a minute, Shah Jahan imprisoned Jahangir? Really? But t...